Broward | Case 11-0410E Correction | 2011-03-16
Florida special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 11-0410E Correction
- Date
- March 16, 2011
- Parties / district (official listing)
- Broward
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
*. *. *., )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 11-0410E
)
BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, )
)
Respondent. )
___________________________________)
CORRECTION TO FINAL ORDER
The undersigned issued a Final Order in this matter on
March 10, 2011. Shortly thereafter, it was brought to the
attention of the undersigned that the undersigned had cited to
the incorrect evidence in support of the decision in this
matter. The error brought to the undersigned's attention does
not change the final decision; however, in light of the notice
of the error:
(a) The following Finding of Fact is substituted for
Finding of Fact numbered 6 and the Endnotes remain the same in
the Final Order:
6. The School Board has an Agreement with a local college
(College).
A. Among other things, the Agreement between the School
Board and the College provides that: (1) the School Board must
weigh dual enrollment courses the same as advanced placement,
Page 2
2
International Baccalaureate, and Advanced International
Certificate of Education courses when grade point averages are
calculated, and alternative grade calculation and weighting
systems that discriminate against dual enrollment courses are
prohibited2; and (2) entrance eligibility for dual enrollment
includes a 3.0 cumulative unweighted GPA and, for specific
placement information, as to eligibility, students should refer
to, among other things, the institution's catalog 3; and (3) a
dual enrollment program is an articulated acceleration mechanism
between the School Board and the College.4
B. The College's Accelerated Mechanisms Handbook provides,
among other things, that dual enrollment eligibility
requirements for the School Board students include:
2. Students must have achieved a minimum
3.0 unweighted grade point average (GPA).
An exception can only be made by the Vice
President for Academic Affairs or the
Academic Standards Committee.
3. Students must maintain a 3.0 grade point
average in their other high school academic
work and must earn a "C" or better in all
college-level work in order to continue in
the program.
(emphasis added)
(b) The following Conclusions Of Law are substituted for
Conclusions of Law numbered 33 and 34 (only the phrase "via
specifically directing students to the College's handbook for
Page 3
3
dual enrollment eligibility information, which is the College's
Accelerated Mechanisms Handbook" is added to both):
33. Pertinent hereto, the Agreement, via specifically
directing students to the College's handbook for dual enrollment
eligibility information, which is the College's Accelerated
Mechanisms Handbook, provides that, for continued eligibility in
the Dual Enrollment program, a student is required to have a 3.0
unweighted GPA in high school academic work and to earn a 2.0
("C") or better in college-level work.
34. The evidence demonstrates that the School Board failed
to comply with the Agreement, via specifically directing
students to the College's handbook for dual enrollment
eligibility information, which is the College's Accelerated
Mechanisms Handbook, in determining the Child's continued
eligibility for the Dual Enrollment program. For continued
eligibility, in accordance with the Agreement, the School Board
should have performed two separate calculations: (a) a
recalculation of the Child's unweighted GPA using only the
grades that the Child received in the High School's academic
courses; and (b) a calculation using only the grades received by
the Child in the College's courses.
All other Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Endnotes in the Final Order remain the same.
Page 4
4
DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2011, in
Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
ERROL H. POWELL
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the
Division of Administrative Hearings
this 16th day of March, 2011.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Brion L. Blackwelder, Esquire
Michelle R. Dessimoz, Intern
Francesca Annunziata, Intern
Jessica Chiappone, Intern
Shepard Broad Law Center
3305 College Avenue, Room 144
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314
Barbara J. Myrick, Esquire
Broward County School Board
600 Southeast Third Avenue, 11th Floor
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Lois Tepper, Acting General Counsel
Department of Education
1244 Turlington Building, Suite 1244
325 West Gaines Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
Page 5
5
Kim Komisar, Section Administrator
Bureau of Exceptional Education
and Student Services
Department of Education
325 West Gaines Street, Suite 614
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400
James F. Notter, Superintendent
Broward County School District
600 Southeast Third Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW
This decision is final unless an adversely affected party:
a) brings a civil action, within 30 days
after the date of this decision, in the
appropriate state circuit court pursuant to
Section 1003.57(1)(b), Florida Statutes
(2009), and Florida Administrative Code Rule
6A-6.03313(7)(j); or
b) within 30 days after the rendition of
this decision, files a notice of appeal with
the clerk of the Division of Administrative
Hearings, and files a copy of the notice,
accompanied by any filing fees prescribed by
law, with the clerk of the appropriate state
district court of appeal, in accordance with
Section 1003.57(1)(b), Florida Statutes;
Section 120.68(2)(a), Florida Statutes; and
the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.
