EducationLawyers.com

Broward | Case 11-0410E Correction | 2011-03-16

Florida special education due-process decision

Case number
11-0410E Correction
Date
March 16, 2011
Parties / district (official listing)
Broward

Open saved decision PDF · Official source

This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.

Decision text

Page 1

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS *. *. *., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 11-0410E ) BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, ) ) Respondent. ) ___________________________________) CORRECTION TO FINAL ORDER The undersigned issued a Final Order in this matter on March 10, 2011. Shortly thereafter, it was brought to the attention of the undersigned that the undersigned had cited to the incorrect evidence in support of the decision in this matter. The error brought to the undersigned's attention does not change the final decision; however, in light of the notice of the error: (a) The following Finding of Fact is substituted for Finding of Fact numbered 6 and the Endnotes remain the same in the Final Order: 6. The School Board has an Agreement with a local college (College). A. Among other things, the Agreement between the School Board and the College provides that: (1) the School Board must weigh dual enrollment courses the same as advanced placement,

Page 2

2 International Baccalaureate, and Advanced International Certificate of Education courses when grade point averages are calculated, and alternative grade calculation and weighting systems that discriminate against dual enrollment courses are prohibited2; and (2) entrance eligibility for dual enrollment includes a 3.0 cumulative unweighted GPA and, for specific placement information, as to eligibility, students should refer to, among other things, the institution's catalog 3; and (3) a dual enrollment program is an articulated acceleration mechanism between the School Board and the College.4 B. The College's Accelerated Mechanisms Handbook provides, among other things, that dual enrollment eligibility requirements for the School Board students include: 2. Students must have achieved a minimum 3.0 unweighted grade point average (GPA). An exception can only be made by the Vice President for Academic Affairs or the Academic Standards Committee. 3. Students must maintain a 3.0 grade point average in their other high school academic work and must earn a "C" or better in all college-level work in order to continue in the program. (emphasis added) (b) The following Conclusions Of Law are substituted for Conclusions of Law numbered 33 and 34 (only the phrase "via specifically directing students to the College's handbook for

Page 3

3 dual enrollment eligibility information, which is the College's Accelerated Mechanisms Handbook" is added to both): 33. Pertinent hereto, the Agreement, via specifically directing students to the College's handbook for dual enrollment eligibility information, which is the College's Accelerated Mechanisms Handbook, provides that, for continued eligibility in the Dual Enrollment program, a student is required to have a 3.0 unweighted GPA in high school academic work and to earn a 2.0 ("C") or better in college-level work. 34. The evidence demonstrates that the School Board failed to comply with the Agreement, via specifically directing students to the College's handbook for dual enrollment eligibility information, which is the College's Accelerated Mechanisms Handbook, in determining the Child's continued eligibility for the Dual Enrollment program. For continued eligibility, in accordance with the Agreement, the School Board should have performed two separate calculations: (a) a recalculation of the Child's unweighted GPA using only the grades that the Child received in the High School's academic courses; and (b) a calculation using only the grades received by the Child in the College's courses. All other Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Endnotes in the Final Order remain the same.

Page 4

4 DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2011, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida. S ERROL H. POWELL Administrative Law Judge Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 16th day of March, 2011. COPIES FURNISHED: Brion L. Blackwelder, Esquire Michelle R. Dessimoz, Intern Francesca Annunziata, Intern Jessica Chiappone, Intern Shepard Broad Law Center 3305 College Avenue, Room 144 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314 Barbara J. Myrick, Esquire Broward County School Board 600 Southeast Third Avenue, 11th Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Lois Tepper, Acting General Counsel Department of Education 1244 Turlington Building, Suite 1244 325 West Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400

Page 5

5 Kim Komisar, Section Administrator Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services Department of Education 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 614 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0400 James F. Notter, Superintendent Broward County School District 600 Southeast Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW This decision is final unless an adversely affected party: a) brings a civil action, within 30 days after the date of this decision, in the appropriate state circuit court pursuant to Section 1003.57(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2009), and Florida Administrative Code Rule 6A-6.03313(7)(j); or b) within 30 days after the rendition of this decision, files a notice of appeal with the clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings, and files a copy of the notice, accompanied by any filing fees prescribed by law, with the clerk of the appropriate state district court of appeal, in accordance with Section 1003.57(1)(b), Florida Statutes; Section 120.68(2)(a), Florida Statutes; and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Research Florida special education decisions