C.H. obo A.H. v Cherry Hill Twp BOE | Case 11781-18 | 2018-09-05
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 11781-18
- Date
- 9/5/2018
- Parties / district (official listing)
- C.H. obo A.H. v Cherry Hill Twp BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 11781-18
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2019 28591
C.H. ON BEHALF OF A.H.,
Petitioner,
v.
CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
_______________________________
Brandon R. Croker, Esq., for petitioner (Comegno Law Group, P.C., attorneys)
Robin S. Ballard, Esq., for respondent ( Schenck, Price, Smith & King, L.L.P. ,
attorneys)
Record Closed: September 4, 2018 Decided: September 5, 2018
BEFORE LISA JAMES-BEAVERS, Acting Director and Chief ALJ:
On May 31, 2018, petitioner filed a due process complaint with the Department
of Education, Office of Special Education Programs on behalf of the minor child A.H., in
which she agrees with the Individualized Education Program (IEP), program, placement
and related services proposed by respondent Cherry Hill Township Board of Education
(Board) and seeks an Order implementing the IEP. O n May 30, 2018, G.H. filed a due
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 11781-18
2
process petition that the IEP, program, placement and related services to be provided
by the respondent do not provide a free and appropriate public education (FAPE).
This matter was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for a due
process hearing. The OAL received the matter on August 15, 2018 and an initial
hearing was scheduled for August 30, 2018 . Since petitioner G.H., in OAL Dkt. No.
EDS 11780-18, failed to appear on his scheduled date and has not called or written to
the undersigned t o explain hi s failure to appear and his petition was the only
impediment to implementing the IEP, there is no opposition to the IEP .
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the IEP in the matter may implemented.
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R.
§ 300.514 (2017) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action
either in the Law Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the
United States. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2017). If the parent or
adult student feels that this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to
program or services, this concern should be communicated in writing to the Directo r,
Office of Special Education Programs.
September 5, 2018
DATE LISA JAMES-BEAVERS
Acting Director and Chief
Administrative Law Judge
Date Received at Agency
Date Mailed to Parties:
caa
