C.R. o/b/o C.R. v. East Orange Board of Education Docket Number EDS 08812-17 | Case EDS 08812-17 | 2018-03-20
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- EDS 08812-17
- Date
- 3/20/2018
- Parties / district (official listing)
- C.R. o/b/o C.R. v. East Orange Board of Education Docket Number EDS 08812-17
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
(CONSOLIDATED)
OAL DKT. NOS. EDS 08812-17 and
EDS 08944-17
AGENCY DKT. NOS. 2017-26230
and 2017-26231
C.R. ON BEHALF OF C.R.,
Petitioner,
v.
EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
__________________________
C.R., petitioner, pro se
Avis Bishop-Thompson, Esq., for respondent (DeCotiis, FitzPatrick and Cole,
attorneys)
Record Closed: March 20, 2018 Decided: March 20, 2018
BEFORE MICHAEL ANTONIEWICZ, ALJ:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The Off ice of Special Education Policy and Procedure of the New Jersey
Department of Education transmitt ed the matters to the Office of Administrative Law for
Page 2
OAL DKT. NOS. EDS 08812-17 and EDS 08944-17
2
a hearing. The OAL received the file s on June 22 and 23, 2017 .1 C.R. on behalf of
C.R. filed petitions for due process against the East Orange Board of Education
seeking access to an AAC device and an appropriate placement.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I FIND the following uncontested FACTS:
1. By notice dated July 27, 2017 , the parties were notified of the hearing scheduled
for February 12, 2018.
2. Petitioner nor counsel for the Board appeared for the hearing.
3. To date, this office has not received an explanation for the failure to appear or a
letter advising the matter had been resolved.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Based on the foregoing facts, I CONCLUDE that the parties have abandoned
this matter and that it should be returned to the transmitting agency.
Based on the applicable law, if the judge does no t receive an explanation for the
nonappearance, the judge may direct the Clerk to return the matter to the transmitting
agency for appropriate disposition. Petitioner and the Board failed to appear at the
scheduled proceeding, and failed to provide an exp lanation for the nonappearance.
Accordingly, the Clerk should return this matter to the Office of Special Education Policy
and Procedure.
ORDER
It is ORDERED that this matter be DISMISSED.
1 For purposes of this Final Decision, I ORDER that the above matters be and hereby are consolidated.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NOS. EDS 08812-17 and EDS 08944-17
3
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk return this file to the Office of Special
Education Policy and Procedure of the New Jersey Department of Education.
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R.
§ 300.514 (2017) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action
either in the Law Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the
United States. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2017). If the parent or
adult student feels that this decision is not being fully implemented with res pect to
program or services, this concern should be communicated in writing to the Director,
Office of Special Education Programs.
March 20, 2018
DATE MICHAEL ANTONIEWICZ, ALJ
Date Received at Agency
Date Mailed to Parties:
jb
