EducationLawyers.com

DB obo AB v. Gloucester Township BOE | Case 04935-21 | 2023-06-12

New Jersey special education due-process decision

Case number
04935-21
Date
06/12/2023
Parties / district (official listing)
DB obo AB v. Gloucester Township BOE

Open saved decision PDF · Official source

This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.

Decision text

Page 1

New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW FINAL DECISION OAL DKT. NO. EDS 04935-21 AGENCY DKT. NO. 2021-32754 D.B. ON BEHALF OF A.B., Petitioner, v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent. ____________________________ D.B., petitioner, pro se Brett E.J. Gorman, Esq., for respondent (Parker McCay, P.A., attorneys) Record Closed: April 28, 2023 Decided: June 12, 2023 BEFORE JUDITH LIEBERMAN , ALJ: STATEMENT OF THE CASE Petitioner, D.B., on behalf of student A.B., filed this due process petition in which he sought an extended school year and Orton Gilli ngham reading instruction. In October and November 2022, multiple attempts were made to communicate with petitioner. Because petitioner did not respond, a hearing was scheduled for January 3, 2023. Petitioner failed to appear for that hearing. The matter was rescheduled to April

Page 2

OAL DKT. NO. EDS 04935-21 2 28, 2023. Petitioner failed to appear for that hearing. To date, no letter of explanation has been received from petitioner regarding his failure to respond to communications or to appear for scheduled events. Petitioner has not forwarded either a letter of withdrawal, a request to move forward to a hearing, or information regarding settlement discussions. Counsel for respondent has advised that petitioner no longer resides in the school district that is the subject of this petition. N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.4(a) provides that, if, after appropriate noti ce, a party does not appear in any proceeding scheduled by a judge, the judge shall hold the matter for one day before taking any action. If the judge does not receive an explanation for the nonappearance within one day, the judge may direct the Clerk to return the matter to the transmitting agency for appropriate disposition. Because the petitioner has failed to appear for all scheduled appearances and has not contacted the O ffice of Administrative Law to address these failures, I CONCLUDE that petitioner has abandoned his appeal. ORDER Given my findings of fact and conclusions of law, I ORDER that this case be DISMISSED.

Page 3

OAL DKT. NO. EDS 04935-21 3 This decision is final under 20 U.S.C.A. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514 (2023) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action in the Law Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20 U.S.C.A. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2016). If the parent or adult student believes that this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to any program or service, then this concern should be communicated , in writing to the Directo r of the Office of Special Education. June 12, 2023 DATE JUDITH LIEBERMAN, ALJ Date Received at Agency Date Mailed to Parties: JL/jm

Research New Jersey special education decisions