EH obo NH v Franklin Lakes Borough BOE Docket Number 01303-20 | Case 01303-20 | 2020-01-30
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 01303-20
- Date
- 1/30/2020
- Parties / district (official listing)
- EH obo NH v Franklin Lakes Borough BOE Docket Number 01303-20
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
SUFFICIENCY CHALLENGE
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 01303-20
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2020-31152
E.H. ON BEHALF OF N.H.,
Petitioner,
v.
FRANKLIN LAKES BORO
BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
_________________________________
Record Closed: January 30, 2020 Decided: January 30, 2020
BEFORE BARRY E. MOSCOWITZ, ALJ:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This decision addresses a sufficiency challenge under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)(2)(A),
34 C.F.R. § 300.508(d) (2019), and N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(f).
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the documents submitted regarding this sufficiency challenge, I FIND
the following as FACT:
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 01303-20
2
On January 23, 2020 , petitioner filed a request for due process hearing with the
Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP).
On January 27, 2020, respondent filed a sufficiency challenge to this request under
20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)(2)(A), 34 C.F.R. § 300.508(d) (2019), and N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(f).
On January 15, 2020, OSEP transmitted the sufficiency challenge to the Office of
Administrative Law to determine whether this request for due process hearing meets the
requirements of 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(7)(A).
In her petition, petitioner enumerates 180 allegations, including her assertion that
respondent did not provide an appropriate education for her child, but she does not
propose a resolution of her problem or state the specific issues in dispute.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(7)(A), a due process complaint must provide notice of
the following:
(I) the name of the child, the address of the residence of
the child (or available contact information in the case of a
homeless child), and the name of the school the child is
attending;
(II) in the case of a homeless child or youth (within the
meaning of section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)), available contact
information for the child and the name of the school the child
is attending;
(III) a description of the nature of the problem of the child
relating to such proposed initiation or change, including facts
relating to such problem; and
(IV) a proposed resolution of the problem to the extent
known and available to the party at the time.
[20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)(7)(A)(ii).]
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 01303-20
3
More pointedly, under N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(c), a request for a due process hearing
must state the specific issues in dispute, relevant facts, and the relief sought:
A request for a due process hearing shall be made in writing
to the State Director of the Office of Special Education
Programs. The party initiating the due process hearing shall
send a copy of the request to the other party. The written
request shall note that a copy has been sent to the other party.
The written request shall include the student's name,
student's address, the student's date of birth, the name of the
school the student is attending and shall state the specific
issues in dispute, relevant facts and the relief sought and, in
the case of a homeless child, available contact information for
the child and the name of the school the child is attending.
[N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(c).]
In this case, petitioner does not propose a resolution of her problem. She merely
describes the nature of her problem, which centers around how respondent processed
her request for home instruction, and how respondent ultimately provided that instruction.
She does not state the specific issues in dispute or the relief sought. As respondent
writes, “Petitioner does not connect any of the allegations to an alleged special education
dispute . . . for which she could be provided a due process hearing.” Accordingly, I
CONCLUDE that the notice contained in the due process complaint is insufficient.
ORDER
Given my findings of fact and conclusions of law, I ORDER that the request for due
process hearing be DISMISSED.
Page 4
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 01303-20
4
This decision is final under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and is appealable under 20
U.S.C. § 1415(g)(2) by filing a petition and bringing a civil action in the Law Division of
the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States.
January 30, 2020
DATE BARRY E. MOSCOWITZ, ALJ
Date Received at Agency: January 30, 2020__________________
Date Sent to Parties:
dr
