G.F. o/b/o S.F. v. Ewing Township Board of Education Docket Number EDS 5626-18 | Case EDS 5626-18 | 2018-04-20
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- EDS 5626-18
- Date
- 4/20/2018
- Parties / district (official listing)
- G.F. o/b/o S.F. v. Ewing Township Board of Education Docket Number EDS 5626-18
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
DECISION ON
SUFFICIENCY OF COMPLAINT
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 5626-18
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2018-27829
G.F. O/B/O S.F,
Petitioners,
v.
EWING TOWNSHIP BOARD
OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
________________________
G.F., petitioner, pro se
Robin Ballard, Esq., for respondent (Schenck, Price, Smith and King, LLP,
attorneys)
Record Closed: April 18, 2018 Decided: April 20, 2018
BEFORE LISA JAMES-BEAVERS, Acting Director and Chief ALJ:
On April 12, 2018 , petitioner filed a due process complaint with the Department
of Education, Office of Special Education Programs . On April 18, 2018 , respondent
filed a notice asserting that the complaint is insufficien t for the following reasons : S.F.
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 5626-18
2
has been removed from the care and custody of petitioner; t he Division of Child
Protection and Permanency (DCP&P) has legal and physical custody of S.F. ; petitioner
failed to supply a current address for S.F.; the petitio n fails to articulate a dispute
regarding S.F.’s special education program and any facts relevant to same ; and
petitioner provides no facts to substantiate the claim that the school district refuses to
allow the child back into the district and further has no reference to the child’s special
education needs or program. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)(2)(A); 34 C.F.R. § 300.508(d)). The
Office of Special Education Programs transmitted this case to the Office of
Administrative Law, where it was filed on April 19, 2018.
In order to obtain a hearing on a due process complaint or to engage in a
resolution session based upon a due process complaint, the petitioner’s due process
complaint must provide information including the following: the name of the child; the
address of the residence of the child, or, if homeless, available contact information for
the child; the name of the school the child is attending; a description of the nature of the
problem of the child relating to the proposed or refused initiation or change; th e facts
relating to the problem; and a proposed resolution to the problem , i.e., relief sought, to
the extent known and available to the party at the time . 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(7)(A); 34
C.F.R. § 300.508(b), (c); N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(a).
Having reviewed the filed complaint, I find and conclude that it does not set forth
the information required. T he complaint includes the name of the child and states that
the child is not attending any school . The complaint does not include the following : the
address of the residence of the child ; a description of the nature of the problem relating
to the proposed or refused initiation or change ; or the facts relating to the problem. The
dispute set forth in the complaint is that he believes the school district has refu sed to let
the child back into the school district. There are no facts set forth to substantiate the
claim and there are no facts set forth indicating there is a dispute with S.F.’s special
education needs pursuant to N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(a).
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 5626-18
3
Further, the proposed resolution to the problem , specifically “to work with and
communicate with parent, not the child” would contradict the Child Protection
Multipurpose Order attached to the sufficiency challenge that gives legal custody to
DCPP and physical custody to a DCP&P resource home. (Exhibit 1.) As set forth in the
sufficiency challenge, G.F., has no legal or physical custody of S.F. Therefore, G.F. has
no standing to bring this complaint for due process.
The complaint fails to set forth a dispute regardi ng S.F.’s special education
program with facts to support the claim as required by 20 U.S.C. § 1415(c)(2)(A); 34
C.F.R. § 300.508(d) ; and N.J.A.C. 6A:14 -2.7(a) and fails to set forth relief that is
available to G.F.
I therefore find and conclude that the complaint is insufficient and I ORDER the
due process complaint DISMISSED.
Respondent shall have fifteen days after filing of an amended complaint to file a
notice concerning the sufficiency of the complaint. If an amended complaint is timely
filed, the timelines for the resolution meeting and due process hearing shall commence
on the date that complaint is received by the Office of Administrative Law . 20 U.S.C. §
1415 (c)(2)(E); 34 C.F.R. § 300.508(d)(4).
Page 4
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 5626-18
4
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415( g)(2) and is appealable by
filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law Division of the Superi or
Court of New Jersey or in a District Court of the United States. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(g)(2).
April 20, 2018
DATE LISA JAMES-BEAVERS
Acting Director and Chief
Administrative Law Judge
Date Received at Agency: _______________________________
Date Sent to Parties:
caa
