JV obo BC v Wayne Twp BOE | Case 03044-22 | 2022-05-23
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 03044-22
- Date
- 5/23/2022
- Parties / district (official listing)
- JV obo BC v Wayne Twp BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
FINAL DECISION
FAILURE TO APPEAR/PROSECUTE
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 03044-22
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2022-34033
J.V. ON BEHALF OF B.C.,
Petitioner,
v.
WAYNE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF
EDUCATION,
Respondent.
_____________________________________
No appearance by or on behalf of petitioner
Philip E. Stern, Esq., for respondent Wayne Township Board of Education
(DiFrancesco, Bateman, Kunzman, Davis, Lehrer & Flaum, P .C., attorneys)
Record Closed: May 6, 2022 Decided: May 23, 2022
BEFORE SUSAN L. OLGIATI, ALJ
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 03044-22
2
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On or about March 17, 2022, pro se petitioner J.V., on behalf of her adult son, B.C.,
filed a due process petition seeking transportation by van as mandated by his
Individualized Education Program (IEP). Thereafter, on or about April 18, 2022, the
matter was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for hearing as a
contested case.
The matter was assigned to me for purposes of conducting a settlement
conference scheduled on April 29, 2022, via Zoom remote video platform.
On the date of the April 29, 2022, settlement conference, J.V. failed to appear.
During the settlement conference, district case manager, Jason Colatrella, contacted J.V.
via email/text message and inquired whether she intended to appear for the conference.
J.V. advised Mr. Colatrella that she no longer intended to pursue the petition.
Thereafter, Philip E. Stern, Esq., counsel for the district, sent a letter dated April
29, 2022, to the undersigned with copy to J.V., confirming the above referenced events
that occurred during the scheduled settlement conference.
On May 3, 2022, Alison Sanchez of the OAL, emailed J.V. requesting confirmation
of her intent to withdraw the due process petitioner no later than May 5, 2022.
As of the date of this decision, no response has been received from J.V.
LEGAL ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.4(a) provides that if a party fails to appear for a scheduled
proceeding the judge shall hold the matter for one day before taking any action. N.J.A.C.
1:1-14.4(c) further provides that if the judge receives an explanation for the
nonappearance and “concludes that there was no good cause for the failure to appear,”
the judge may refuse to reschedule the matter and shall issue an initial decision explaining
the basis for that conclusion, or may reschedule the matter and, at his or her discretion,
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 03044-22
3
order the delinquent party to pay costs and fees to the State or the aggrieved person or
other case-related action the judge deems appropriate.
Based on the foregoing, I CONCLUDE that petitioner J.V. has provided no
explanation or response and therefore has failed to demonstrate good cause for her
failure to appear for the April 29, 2022, settlement conference in this matter. I further
CONCLUDE that based on statements reported by district representative, Jason
Colatrella, as well as J.V’s failure to respond to the April 29, 2022, letter of the district’s
counsel, it appears that petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the due process petition
filed on behalf of her adult son. Accordingly, I CONCLUDE that the petition should be
returned to the transmitting agency for dismissal without prejudice.
ORDER
Based upon the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the due process petition filed by
petitioner should be returned to the Department of Education, Office of Special Education,
for dismissal of the petition without prejudice.
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514
(2022) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law
Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20
U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2022). If the parent or adult student feels that
this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services, this
concern should be communicated in writing to the Director, Office of Special Education.
May 23, 2022
DATE SUSAN L. OLGIATI, ALJ
Date Received at Agency:
Mailed to Parties:
SLO:as
