KM obo AM v Monmouth Reg BOE | Case 05321-22 | 2022-07-05
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 05321-22
- Date
- 7/5/2022
- Parties / district (official listing)
- KM obo AM v Monmouth Reg BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
EMERGENT RELIEF
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05321-22
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2022-34591
K.M. ON BEHALF OF A.M.,
Petitioner,
v.
MONMOUTH REGIONAL BOARD
OF EDUCATION, MONMOUTH COUNTY,
Respondent.
_____________________________________
Michael I. Inzelbuch, Esq., for petitioner
Paul C. Kalac, Esq., for respondent (Weiner Law Group, attorneys)
Record Closed: July 1, 2022 Decided: July 5, 2022
BEFORE TRICIA M. CALIGUIRE, ALJ:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
By a request for emergent relief and petition for due process, petitioner K.M. seeks
(1) an order applying the doctrine of stay-put and requiring the immediate return of A.M.
to Shrub Oak International School in Mohegan Lakes, New York, consistent with the
individual education program (IEP) adopted for A.M. as of October 26, 2021, by which
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05321-22
2
A.M. was placed at Shrub Oak; (2) compensatory education for the period in which A.M.
did not receive IEP-mandated services, between March 18, 2020, and September 1,
2021; and (3) reimbursement of related costs and fees.
This matter was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law on June 29, 2022,
for an emergent relief hearing and a final determination in accordance with 20 U.S.C. §
1415 and 34 C.F.R. §§ 300.500 to 300.587. Oral argument on emergent relief was held
on July 1, 2022, and the record closed.
FACTUAL DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS
The following facts are not in dispute and form the basis for the below decision.
Accordingly, I FIND as FACTS:
1. K.M. is a twenty-year-old adult male who is eligible for special education
(SE) and related services in the Autism classification category.
2. Since approximately July 2020, A.M. has attended Shrub Oak International
School (Shrub Oak), where he is placed in a therapeutic residential
program, at the expense of the Board.
3. A.M.’s current IEP, adopted on October 26, 2021, and effective through
October 26, 2022, continues his placement at Shrub Oak.
4. Since July 2020, the Board has entered a series of annual tuition contracts
with Shrub Oak by which the Board has agreed to pay tuition for A.M. for a
one-year period.
5. On or about March 2022, a dispute arose between the Board and Shrub
Oak over tuition for the period July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023.
Notwithstanding that dispute, Shrub Oak sent a contract to the Board by
which Shrub Oak agreed to provide SE and related residential and
therapeutic services to A.M. and the Board agreed to pay for such services
in the amount of $408,000 annually, or $34,000/month.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05321-22
3
6. The Board approved this contract by resolution at its regular meeting of
June 21, 2022.
7. On or before June 30, 2022, Shrub Oak contacted K.M. to remove A.M. from
the residential facility due to the financial dispute with the Board. Shortly
thereafter, K.M. filed this action for emergent relief.
8. During a prehearing conference on July 1, 2022, the parties stipulated that
A.M. must remain in a residential placement and cannot be removed from
Shrub Oak until a mutually agreed upon placement is identified and A.M.
has been accepted by such facility.
9. During the emergent hearing on July 1, 2022, the Board, through counsel,
agreed to continue to pay tuition to Shrub Oak pursuant to the contract
approved on June 21, 2022, pending the identification of a mutually agreed
upon alternate placement and the enrollment of A.M. in such placement.
LEGAL ANALYSIS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
N.J.A.C. 1:6A-12.1(a) provides that the affected parent may apply in writing for
emergent relief. An emergent relief application is required to set forth the specific relief
sought and the specific circumstances that the applicant contends justify the relief sought.
Each application is required to be supported by an affidavit prepared by an affiant with
personal knowledge of the facts contained therein.
Emergent relief shall only be requested for specific issues, including a break in the
delivery of services. N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(r). Here, petitioner has requested emergent
relief to maintain A.M. in his out-of-district, residential placement. Therefore, I
CONCLUDE that petitioner has established that the issue in this matter concerns a break
in the delivery of SE and related therapeutic services to A.M.
Page 4
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05321-22
4
The standards for emergent relief are set forth in Crowe v. DeGioia, 90 N.J. 126
(1982), and are codified at N.J.A.C. 6A:3-1.6. The petitioners bear the burden of proving:
1. that the party seeking emergent relief will suffer
irreparable harm if the requested relief is not granted;
2. the existence of a settled legal right underlying the
petitioner’s claim;
3. that the party seeking emergent relief has a likelihood of
prevailing on the merits of the underlying claim; and
4. when the equities and the interests of the parties are
balanced, the party seeking emergent relief will suffer
greater harm than the respondent.
[Crowe, 90 N.J. at 132-34.]
Based on the above-listed facts, the stipulations of the parties and their mutual
agreement to cooperate in the resolution of this matter, I CONCLUDE that the emergent
relief sought by petitioner is appropriate and, therefore:
I ORDER that A.M. shall remain at Shrub Oak until an alternate placement is
agreed upon by petitioner K.M. and respondent Monmouth Regional Board of Education
and A.M. is accepted by and enrolled in such alternate placement.
I further ORDER that petitioner and respondent shall begin immediately to
cooperate on identifying and securing an alternate residential placement for A.M. that
meets the criteria described in the October 26, 2021 IEP (referenced above). Such
cooperation by the parties shall include, but not be limited to, the consent by K.M. to the
release of records for intake evaluations, the participation of both parties in the intake
evaluation processes at and/or with potential placements, and the entry by respondent of
a tuition contract with the agreed-upon placement covering costs for A.M. from the date
of his enrollment through June 30, 2023.
Page 5
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05321-22
5
Finally, I ORDER that the Board shall pay tuition to Shrub Oak for A.M. on a pro
rata basis according to the contract with Shrub Oak approved by the Board on June 21,
2022 (and described more fully above).
This decision on application for emergency relief shall remain in effect until the
issuance of the decision on the merits in this matter. The hearing having been requested
by the parents, this matter is hereby returned to the Department of Education for a local
resolution session, pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f)(1)(B)(i). If the parents or adult student
feel that this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services,
this concern should be communicated in writing to the Director, Office of Special
Education Programs.
July 5, 2022
DATE TRICIA M. CALIGUIRE, ALJ
Date Received at Agency:
Date Mailed to Parties:
TMC/nmn
