L.J. o/b/o Z.B. v. Upper Saddle River Board of Education | Case EDS 04667-18 | 2018-04-20
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- EDS 04667-18
- Date
- 4/20/2018
- Parties / district (official listing)
- L.J. o/b/o Z.B. v. Upper Saddle River Board of Education
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 04667-18
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2018-27617
L.J. ON BEHALF OF Z.B.,
Petitioner,
v.
UPPER SADDLE RIVER
BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
_____________________________
No appearance from L.J.
Stacey T. Cherry, Esq., for respondent (Fogarty & Hara, attorneys)
Record Closed: April 20, 2018 Decided: April 20, 2018
BEFORE LESLIE Z. CELENTANO, ALJ:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Petitioner failed to appear for the in-person settlement conference in this matter.
For the unreasonable failure to comply with any order of a judge or with any requirement
of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules, N.J.A.C. 1:1-1.1 to -21.6, the judge of a
case may take any appropriate case-related action, including dismissal. See N.J.A.C. 1:1-
14.14.
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 04667-18
2
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On March 30, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for due process with the Department
of Education, Office of Special Education.
On April 3, 2018, the Office of Special Education transmitted the case to the Office
of Administrative Law under the Administrative Procedure Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1 to -15,
and the act establishing the Office of Administrative Law, N.J.S.A. 52:14F-1 to -23, for a
hearing under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules, N.J.A.C. 1:1-1.1 to -21.6, and
the Special Education Program, N.J.A.C. 1:6A-1.1 to -18.5. The matter was scheduled
for an in-person settlement conference on April 19, 2018.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On April 19, 2018 , petitioner did not appear for the settlement conference.
Respondent, however did appear. Several attempts to reach petitioner were made to her
mobile and work telephone number. No return call has been received from petitioner.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
For the unreasonable failure to comply with any order of a judge or with any
requirement of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules, N.J.A.C. 1:1-1.1 to -21.6, the
judge of a case may take any appropriate case -related action, including dismissal. See
N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.14. In this case, petitioner failed to appear for the hearing of this case
after she was given notice, and to date, has still not contacted this tribunal to explain why.
Given this unreasonable failure to appear, I CONCLUDE that this case should be
dismissed under the authority granted to me by N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.14.
ORDER
Given my find ings of fact and conclusions of law, I ORDER that this case be
DISMISSED.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 04667-18
3
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514
(2017) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law
Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20
U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2017). If the parent or adult student feels that
this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services, this
concern should be communicated in writing to the Directo r, Office of Special Education
Programs.
April 20, 2018
DATE LESLIE Z. CELENTANO, ALJ
Date Received at Agency April 20, 2018
Date Mailed to Parties:
dr
