M.R. obo D.E. v. East Brunswick Township BOE | Case 08924-23 | 2023-10-11
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 08924-23
- Date
- 10/11/2023
- Parties / district (official listing)
- M.R. obo D.E. v. East Brunswick Township BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
DISMISSAL
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 08924-23
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2024-36334
M.R. ON BEHALF OF D.E.,
Petitioner,
v.
EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF
EDUCATION,
Respondent.
____________________________
M.R., petitioner, pro se
Jodi S. Howlett, Esq., for respondent ( Cleary, Giacobbe, Alfieri & Jacobs, LLC ,
attorneys)
Record Closed: October 3, 2023 Decided: October 11,2023
BEFORE JUDITH LIEBERMAN, ALJ:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Petitioner, M.R., on behalf of student D.E., filed this due process petition in which
she sought replacement of D.E.’s helmet and face shield to prevent self -injurious
behavior.
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 08924-23
2
A telephone settlement conference was scheduled to be conducted September 22,
2023, before Hon. Kathleen Calemmo, ALJ. Petitioner did not appear for the conference.
The matter was subsequently referred to me for a hearing. On September 24, 2023, a
notice was issued for a hearing on October 2, 2023, at 4:00 , p.m. The notice provided
the dial-in information the parties were to use to participate. Petitioner did not appear for
the hearing. To date, th is notice has not been returned to this office as unde liverable.
Also, to date, petitioner has not submitted a letter of explanation regarding her failure to
appear for either scheduled event. She has not otherwise communicated with the Office
of Administrative Law about this matter.
N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.4(a) provides that, if, after appropriate notice, a party does not
appear in any proceeding scheduled by a judge, the judge shall hold the matter for one
day before taking any action. If the judge does not receive an explanation for the non -
appearance within one day, the judge may direct the Clerk to return the matter to the
transmitting agency for appropriate disposition.
Because the petitione r has failed to appear for two scheduled appearances and
has not contacted the O ffice of Administrative Law to address these failures, I
CONCLUDE that she has abandoned her appeal.
ORDER
Given my findings of fact and conclusions of law, I ORDER that this case be
DISMISSED.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 08924-23
3
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514
(2022) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law
Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20
U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2022). If the parent or adult student feels that
this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services, this
concern should be communicated in writing to the Director, Office of Special Education.
October 11, 2023____________
DATE JUDITH LIEBERMAN, ALJ
Date Received at Agency
Date Mailed to Parties:
JL/mg/lam
