M.S. and F.S. obo R.C. v. Matawan-Aberdeen Regional BOE and Neptune Township BOE | Case 14198-23 | 2024-04-15
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 14198-23
- Date
- 04/15/2024
- Parties / district (official listing)
- M.S. and F.S. obo R.C. v. Matawan-Aberdeen Regional BOE and Neptune Township BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
FAILURE TO APPEAR
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 14198-23
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2024-36523
M.S. AND F.S. ON BEHALF OF R.C.,
Petitioners,
v.
MATAWAN-ABERDEEN REGIONAL
BOARD OF EDUCATION AND NEPTUNE
TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondents.
M.S. and F.S., petitioners, pro se
Isabel Machado , Esq. , for respondent Matawan -Aberdeen Regional Board of
Education (Machado Law Group, LLC, attorneys)
Diana Anderson, Esq., for respondent Neptune Township Board of Education
Record Closed: April 9, 2024 Decided: April 15, 2024
BEFORE MARY ANN BOGAN, ALJ:
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 14198-23
2
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Petitioners, M.S. and F.S. on behalf of R.C. filed a petition seeking compensatory
education.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND STATEMENT OF FACTS
The Office of Special Education of the New Jersey Department of Education
(Department) transmitted the petition to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL), where it
was filed on December 22, 2023.
A telephone conference was scheduled for January 18, 2024. Petitioners were
notified by regular mail and email. The petitioners did not attend. Additional telephone
conferences were scheduled for February 21, 2024, and April 9, 2024. Petitioners were
notified by regular mail and email for all conferences, but petitioners failed to attend both
telephone conferences. The petitioners never sent an explanation explaining their
reasons for their non-appearance for each of the telephone conferences.
ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.4(a) provides that, if, after appropriate notice, a party does not
appear in any proceeding scheduled by a judge, the judge shall hold the matter for one
day before taking any action. If the judge does not receive an explanation for the
nonappearance within one day, the judge may direct the Clerk to return the matter to the
transmitting agency for appropriate disposition. Petitioners failed to appear at the
scheduled proceeding, and they failed to provide an explanation one day following their
nonappearance or thereafter. Accordingly , the Clerk should return this matter to the
Department of Education.
Based on the foregoing facts and the applicable law, I CONCLUDE that petitioners
have abandoned this matter and that it should be returned to the transmitting agency.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 14198-23
3
ORDER
Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that the petition for due process
be DISMISSED.
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514
(2024) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law
Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20
U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2024). If the parent or adult student feels that
this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services, this
concern should be communicated in writing to the Director, Office of Special Education.
April 15, 2024
DATE MARY ANN BOGAN, ALJ
Date Received at Agency:
Date Mailed to Parties:
MAB/nn
