S.G. obo S.B. v. Newark City BOE | Case 05895-24 | 2024-08-28
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 05895-24
- Date
- 08/28/2024
- Parties / district (official listing)
- S.G. obo S.B. v. Newark City BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
DISMISSAL
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05895-24
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2024-36944
S.G. ON BEHALF OF S.B.,
Petitioner,
v.
NEWARK CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
__________________________
No Appearance by S.G. o/b/o S.B., petitioner, pro se
Jodi Howlett, Esq., for respondent (Machado Law Group, attorneys)
Record Closed: August 27, 2024 Decided: August 28, 2024
BEFORE NANCI G. STOKES, ALJ:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case arises under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20
U.S.C. §§ 1400 to 1482. On January 11, 2024, S.G. o/b/o S.B. filed a petition for a due
process hearing , seeking placement at Central High School and other relief.
On January 31, 2024, the Newark City Board of Education (Newark) filed an
answer.
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05895-24
2
On April 25, 2024, the Office of Special Education of the New Jersey Departme nt
of Education transmitted the case to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) , where it
was filed on May 6, 2024.
The OAL scheduled settlement conferences per the parties’ request on June 10,
2024, and June 24, 2024, but petitioner did not appear. Notably, petitioner emailed the
OAL on June 17, 2024, stating that she would attend the June 24, 2024, conference but
did not. Still, Newark was present.
On June 25, 2024, the case was assigned to me.
The OAL scheduled a pre -hearing conference on July 10, 2024. Although the
OAL offered earlier dates, petitioner did not reply to the OAL’s emails . Still, petitioner
did not attend the pre -hearing conference , but Newark’s counsel did. I scheduled a
hearing for August 23, 2024. Petitioner acknowledged receipt of the hearing notice via
email. However, petitioner did not request an adjournment or advise that she was
unavailable.
On August 23, 2024, Newark appeared, but petitioner did not.
As of today, petitioner has not contacted the OAL regarding her non -appearance at
the hearing.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I FIND the following uncontested FACTS:
Upon transmittal, the OAL attempted to schedule multiple proceedings in this
case. The OAL sent petitioner notices for the conferences and the hearing through the
email and address she provided .
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05895-24
3
While the petitioner acknowledged notices of these events, she failed to appear
and offered no reason for her failures. Indeed, she has not participated in any
scheduled conference or hearing since the case’s transmittal to the OAL, while Newark
was ready to proceed.
More than one business day has passed since the hearing date without any
contact with the OAL by the petitioner.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Under N.J.A.C . 1:1-14.4(a), if a properly noticed party does not appear in any
proceeding scheduled by a judge, the judge shall hold the matter for one day before
acting. If the judge does not receive an explanation for the nonappearance within one
day, the judge may direct the Clerk to return the matter to the transmitting agency for
appropriate disposition. S.G. failed to appear for multiple scheduled proceedings, most
recently on August 23, 2024, and she did not explain those failures to date.
Based on the facts and the applicable law, I CONCLUDE that the petitioner’s
multiple failures to appear for scheduled conferences and a hearing without any
explanation demonstrate that she abandoned this case. Thus, I further CONCLUDE that
the petition should be returned to the transmitting agency as a DISMISSAL.
ORDER
It is ORDERED that the Clerk return this file to the Office of Special Education of
the New Jersey Department of Education as a DISMISSAL.
Page 4
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 05895-24
4
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R.
§ 300.514 (2024) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action
either in the Law Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the
United States. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2024). If the parent or
adult student feels that this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to
program or services, this concern should be communicated in writing to the Directo r,
Office of Special Education .
August 28, 2024
DATE NANCI G. STOKES, ALJ
Date Received at Agency August 28, 2024
Date Mailed to Parties: August 28, 2024
ljb
