T.E. and F.E. o/b/o N.E. v. Randolph Township Board of Education | Case EDS 09153-18 | 2018-06-28
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- EDS 09153-18
- Date
- 6/28/2018
- Parties / district (official listing)
- T.E. and F.E. o/b/o N.E. v. Randolph Township Board of Education
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
DECISION
SUFFICIENCY OF COMPLAINT
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 09153-18
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2018/28338
T.E. and F.E. ON BEHALF OF N.E.,
Petitioner,
v.
RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
__________________________________________
Richard Kaplow, Esq., for petitioners
Robin Ballard, Esq., for respondent (Schenck, Price, Smith &
King, LLP)
Record Closed: June 27, 2018 Decided: June 28, 2018
BEFORE: JOANN LASALA CANDIDO, ALAJ:
The petitioner filed a due process petition on June 22, 2018. On June 26, 2018,
respondent filed a notice asserting that the complaint is insufficient as required by
N.J.A.C. 6A:14-2.7(a) & (c). The Office of Special Education Programs transmitted this
case to the Office of Administrative Law, where it was filed on June 27, 2018.
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 09153-18
2
The District asserts that the Petition is flawed because:
“…The petition did not include Petitioners’ names, N.E.’s disability
category or his name. The name of N.E.’s school of attendance (the Craig
School) is supplied; however, it is a private placement located outside of
Randolph Township. As such, the Board is thus not the local education
agency responsible for N.E.’s education and any due process rights N.E.
might have are limited by N.J.A.C. 6A:14-6.1.”
. . . .
In order to obtain a hearing on a due process complaint or to engage in a
resolution session based upon a due process complaint, the petitioner’s due process
complaint must provide information including the following: the name of the child; the
address of the residence of the child, or, if homeless, available contact information for
the child; the name of the school the child is attending; a description of the natur e of the
problem of the child relating to the proposed or refused initiation or change; the facts
relating to the problem; and a proposed resolution to the problem, i.e., relief sought, to
the extent known and available to the party at the time. 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(7)(A); 34
C.F.R. § 300.508(b), (c).
After reviewing the petition, I FIND that the petition clearly states the name of
petitioners, address, the school N.E. is attending, a description of the nature of the
problem and a proposed resolution to the problem and relief they are seeking.
Having reviewed the petition for due process , I CONCLUDE that it includes the
information required by statute and regulation and therefore is sufficient. I ORDER that
the case be returned to OSEP and that the pa rties proceed with the resolution session
or mediation.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 09153-18
3
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(g)(2) and is appealable by
filing a petition and bringing a civil action either in the Law Division of the Superior Court
of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(g)(2).
June 28, 2018
DATE JOANN LASALA CANDIDO, ALAJ
Date Received at Agency: June 28, 2018
Date Sent to Parties: June 28, 2018
ljb
