EducationLawyers.com

WB and EB obo XB v. Piscataway Township BOE | Case 02929-22 | 2023-03-22

New Jersey special education due-process decision

Case number
02929-22
Date
03/22/2023
Parties / district (official listing)
WB and EB obo XB v. Piscataway Township BOE

Open saved decision PDF · Official source

This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.

Decision text

Page 1

New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW FINAL DECISION DISMISSAL OAL DKT. NO. EDS 02929-22 AGENCY DKT. NO. 2022-34027 W.B. AND E.B. ON BEHALF OF X.B., Petitioners, v. PISCATAWAY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Respondent. W.B. and E.B., petitioners on behalf of X.B., pro se David B. Rubin, Esq., for respondent (Busch Law Group, LLC, attorneys) BEFORE JEFFREY N. RABIN, ALJ: Record Closed: September 7, 2022 Decided: March 22, 2023 This matter was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL), where it was filed on April 13, 2022 , as a contested case. N.J.S.A. 52:14B -1 to -15; N.J.S.A. 52:14F-1 to -13. A settlement conference was held on April 25, 2022, before Mary Ann Bogan, ALJ. The matter did not settle and was assigned to the undersigned . A telephone prehearing was held on May 2, 2022 , at which time a nother telephone hearing was scheduled for

Page 2

OAL DKT. NO. EDS 02929-22 2 May 10, 2022. Petitioners did not appear for that call. Another call was scheduled for June 21, 2022 , and petitioner s again did not appear. A new notice was emailed to the parties on June 26, 2022, scheduling another telephone hearing for September 7, 2022, with a message to the petitioners stating that if they intended to withdraw the petition that the judge would need a formal withdrawal le tter. No response to that email has been received to date. Neither party dialed into the September 7, 2022, call. The petitioners failed to appear for three telephone hearings , without any notice to this court or explanation of good cause for having mi ssed said telephone hearings. I therefore CONCLUDE that petitioners have abandoned their appeal. ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that this appeal be DISMISSED. I hereby FILE this initial decision with the DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION for consideration.

Page 3

OAL DKT. NO. EDS 02929-22 3 This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514 (2022) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2022). If the parent or adult student feels that this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services, this concern should be communicated in writi ng to the Director, Office of Special Education . March 22, 2023 DATE JEFFREY N. RABIN, ALJ Date Received at Agency: March 22, 2023 Date Mailed to Parties: March 22, 2023 JNR/dw

Research New Jersey special education decisions