WB and EB obo XB v. Piscataway Township BOE | Case 02929-22 | 2023-03-22
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 02929-22
- Date
- 03/22/2023
- Parties / district (official listing)
- WB and EB obo XB v. Piscataway Township BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION DISMISSAL
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 02929-22
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2022-34027
W.B. AND E.B. ON BEHALF OF X.B.,
Petitioners,
v.
PISCATAWAY TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF EDUCATION,
Respondent.
W.B. and E.B., petitioners on behalf of X.B., pro se
David B. Rubin, Esq., for respondent (Busch Law Group, LLC, attorneys)
BEFORE JEFFREY N. RABIN, ALJ:
Record Closed: September 7, 2022 Decided: March 22, 2023
This matter was transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL), where it
was filed on April 13, 2022 , as a contested case. N.J.S.A. 52:14B -1 to -15; N.J.S.A.
52:14F-1 to -13.
A settlement conference was held on April 25, 2022, before Mary Ann Bogan, ALJ.
The matter did not settle and was assigned to the undersigned . A telephone prehearing
was held on May 2, 2022 , at which time a nother telephone hearing was scheduled for
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 02929-22
2
May 10, 2022. Petitioners did not appear for that call. Another call was scheduled for
June 21, 2022 , and petitioner s again did not appear. A new notice was emailed to the
parties on June 26, 2022, scheduling another telephone hearing for September 7, 2022,
with a message to the petitioners stating that if they intended to withdraw the petition that
the judge would need a formal withdrawal le tter. No response to that email has been
received to date. Neither party dialed into the September 7, 2022, call.
The petitioners failed to appear for three telephone hearings , without any notice to
this court or explanation of good cause for having mi ssed said telephone hearings. I
therefore CONCLUDE that petitioners have abandoned their appeal.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that this appeal be DISMISSED.
I hereby FILE this initial decision with the DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF SPECIAL
EDUCATION for consideration.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 02929-22
3
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514
(2022) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law
Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20
U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2022). If the parent or adult student feels that
this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services, this
concern should be communicated in writi ng to the Director, Office of Special Education .
March 22, 2023
DATE JEFFREY N. RABIN, ALJ
Date Received at Agency: March 22, 2023
Date Mailed to Parties: March 22, 2023
JNR/dw
