ZP obo WP v. Willingboro Township BOE | Case 09996-22 | 2023-03-28
New Jersey special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 09996-22
- Date
- 03/28/2023
- Parties / district (official listing)
- ZP obo WP v. Willingboro Township BOE
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer
State of New Jersey
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
FINAL DECISION
OAL DKT. NO. EDS 09996-22
AGENCY DKT. NO. 2023-34983
Z.P. ON BEHALF OF W.P.,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLINGBORO TOWNSHIP
BOARD OF EDUCATION ,
Respondent.
____________________________ ___
No appearance from Z.P.
Emily E. Strawbridge, Esq., for respondent (Parker McCay, P.A., attorneys)
Record Closed: March 27, 2023 Decided: March 28, 2023
BEFORE LESLIE Z. CELENTANO , ALJ:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Petitioner failed to appear for the zoom settlement conference in this matter. For
the unreasonable failure to comply with any order of a judge or with any requirement of
the Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules, N.J.A.C. 1:1-1.1 to -21.6, the judge of a case
may take any appropriate case -related action, including dismissal. See N.J.A.C. 1:1-
14.14.
Page 2
OAL DKT. NO. E DS 09996-22
2
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On September 21, 2022 , petitioner filed a petition for due process with the
Department of Education, Office of Special Education.
On November 7, 2022, the Office of Special Education transmitted the case to the
Office of Administrative Law under the Administrative Procedure Act, N.J.S.A. 52:14B-1
to -15, and the act establishing the Office of Administrative Law , N.J.S.A. 52:14F-1 to -
23, for a hearing under the Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules, N.J.A.C. 1:1-1.1 to
-21.6, and the Special Education Program, N.J.A.C. 1:6A-1.1 to -18.5. The matter was
scheduled for a zoom settlement conference on March 27, 2023.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On March 27, 2023, petitioner did not appear for the zoom settlement conference.
Respondent, however did appear. To date, petitioner has not contacted this tribunal to
explain why .
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
For the unreasonable failure to comply with any order of a judge or with any
requirement of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Rules, N.J.A.C. 1:1-1.1 to -21.6, the
judge of a case may take any appropriate c ase-related action, including dismissal . See
N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.14. In this case, petitioner failed to appear for the hearing of this case
after she was given notice, and to date, has still not contacted this tribunal to explain why.
Given this unreasonable failure to appear, I CONCLUDE that this case should be
dismissed under the authority granted to me by N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.14.
ORDER
Given my find ings of fact and conclusions of law, I ORDER that this case be
DISMISSED.
Page 3
OAL DKT. NO. E DS 09996-22
3
This decision is final pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(1)(A) and 34 C.F.R. § 300.514
(2022) and is appealable by filing a complaint and bringing a civil action either in the Law
Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey or in a district court of the United States. 20
U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2); 34 C.F.R. § 300.516 (2022). If the parent or adult student feels that
this decision is not being fully implemented with respect to program or services, this
concern should be communicated in writing to the Directo r, Office of Special Education .
March 28, 2023
DATE LESLIE Z. CELENTANO , ALJ
Date Received at Agency March 28, 2023
Date Mailed to Parties: March 28, 2023
dr
