Reading School District | Case 7516-06-07 | 2007-07-06
Pennsylvania special education due-process decision
- Case number
- 7516-06-07
- Date
- 07/06/2007
- Parties / district (official listing)
- Reading School District
- Hearing officer
- Marcie Romberger
- Issues (official listing)
- Other
Open saved decision PDF · Official source
This page reproduces text extracted from the public decision. The saved PDF controls formatting and wording. No attorney-reviewed summary has been added.
Decision text
Page 1
This is a redacted version of the original hearing officer decision. Select details may have been
removed from the decision to preserve anonymity of the student. The redactions do not affect the
substance of the document.
PENNSYLVANIA
SPECIAL EDUCATION HEARING OFFICER
DECISION
DUE PROCESS HEARING
Name of Child: DC
ODR # 7516/06-07
Date of Birth: xx/xx/xx
Dates of Hearing: May 1, 2007
OPEN HEARING
Parties to the Hearing
: Representative :
Ms. Yolanda Smith Richard L. Guida, Esquire
Reading School District Ma sano Bradley Attorneys at Law
800 Washington Street Suite 201
Reading, PA 19601-3616 1100 Berkshire Boulevard
Wyomissing, PA 19610
Mr. and Mrs. Jonathan S. Corchnoy, Esquire
1515 Market Street
Suite 1510
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Date Record was closed: June 22, 2007
Date of Decision: July 6, 2007
Hearing Officer: Marcie Romberger, Esquire
Page 2
2
BACKGROUND
Student just completed the Second Grade in the Reading School District. Student
has been identified as a child needing accommodations under Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act as a result of his diabetes. Student requested a due process hearing
alleging a need for a full time medical professional who can dispense medication at his
elementary school as an accommodation under Section 504. The Reading School District
does not have a full time medical professional who can dispense medication in the
elementary school Student attends, nor does it feels Student is in needs of such.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Student is a xx year old child who just completed Second grade in the Reading
School District (hereinafter, “District”). N.T. 34, 62.
2. Student was diagnosed in 2003 with Type 1 Diabetes. N.T. 20, 24, 52, 164. He is
insulin dependent. N.T. 20. He is reviewed by [redacted medical] Center every
three months. N.T. 165.
3. Student’s family receives training and instruction on Student’s condition through
[redacted medical] Center. N.T. 24.
4. An average blood sugar level for Student should be between approximately 70
and 150. N.T. 48; P-1.
5. If Student’s blood sugar is over 150, Student receives insulin through a junior
pen. N.T. 27, 96. Student’s blood sugar should be rechecked ten minutes after a
high blood sugar reading. N.T. 27, 96. If Student’s blood sugar level is still high,
physical activity is recommended to burn the extra sugar. Id.
6. A person cannot always tell if a person has high blood sugar without doing a
blood test. N.T. 87.
7. If Student’s blood sugar level is low, between 40 and 70, Student should be
provided a drink or some food. N.T. 28, 29, 96, 193, 194, 195. If Student’s sugar
level is approximately 40 or below, if he is unresponsive, or if he refuses a drink
or a snack when his blood sugar level is low, Student should receive an injection
of Glucagon. N.T. 28, 29, 96, 193, 194, 195.
8. Once, Student refused to drink juice when his blood sugar level was low. N.T.
191, 192. In instances such as this, the correction of the low blood sugar needs to
be by an injection of Glucagon. N.T. 191.
Page 3
3
9. Glucagon alerts the liver to release sugar. N.T. 28. It takes approximately fifteen
minutes for the Glucagon to work once it enters the body. N.T. 114.
10. To prepare Glucagon, a liquid substance is injected into a powder substance,
mixed, and inserted into a needle. N.T. 29.
11. Normally, if Student has low blood sugar levels, he will exhibit symptoms such as
perspiring, his skin will either be pale or flushed, he will say silly things or things
that do not make sense, and he will yawn. N.T. 40. He may also show signs of
weakness or dizziness. N.T. 87.
12. If Student’s blood sugar level drops to a low level, Student can fall into a diabetic
coma which can cause brain damage. N.T. 118, 194.
13. There are times where Student’s blood sugar number was normal, but in reality
his blood sugar was low. N.T. 60.
14. Blood sugar levels can drop pretty rapidly, sometime within a few minutes. N.T.
189.
15. Student’s blood sugar is usually controllable; however, he can still have very low
blood sugar levels. N.T. 192.
16. Student has at least three low blood sugar readings per week. N.T. 48; P-1.
17. Student’s family checks Student’s blood sugar levels every two hours or more if
he is active to ensure his blood sugar does not get too low. N.T. 23, 30, 62.
Student may have a few high or low readings each day if he is active. N.T. 65.
18. Student has had three or four seizures or near seizure behaviors in his life: two or
three instances occurred when he was four years old and one approximately a year
ago. N.T. 58-60, 66-67.
19. Testimony conflicted as to when the last time Student needed an injection of
Glucagon. At one time, Student’s father said it was approximately three years
ago, and at one time he said it was November, 2006. N.T. 30, 81. 1
20. Student was hospitalized in November, 2006 for low blood sugar. N.T. 125; P-1.
He was found dazed and not talking by his parents who called emergency
services. P-1; S-3.
1 There were inconsistencies in the testimony of Student’s father, but this Hearing
Officer did not consider this a lack of credibility or “lying.” Rather, it appeared Student’s
father was too nervous to listen to the question and to think before answering. For
example, Student’s father incorrectly answered even simple questions regarding his son’s
age and/or birthday which had no effect in how I would decide the issue. N.T. 60-61.
Page 4
4
21. On February 8, 2007, insulin adjustments had to be made by Student’s doctors
“due to numerous hypoglycemic episodes.” P-1.
22. Student does not show symptoms of low or high blood sugar at all times of
distress. N.T. 32.
23. A normal school day for Student consists of the following: Student’s family
checks Student’s blood sugar level at breakfast; Student begins school
approximately 8:30 a.m.; Student has a snack at approximately 9:30 a.m.-10:00
a.m.; Student’s blood sugar level is checked at lunchtime at approximately 11:45
a.m.; Student has another snack at 2:00 p.m.; Student’s family rechecks his blood
sugar level at 3:00 p.m. when he returns home, at dinnertime, midnight, and again
between 3:00 and 4:00 a.m. N.T. 31, 95.
24. No one at the District appears to be monitoring Student’s snack or lunch intake to
ensure he is eating. N.T. 33-34, 36, 72.
25. Only the school nurse is permitted by the District to dispense insulin or Glucagon.
N.T. 87-88, 90.
26. The school nurse is at Student’s school, [redacted] Elementary, all day Monday,
Tuesday, and Friday. N.T. 89. On Wednesday and Thursday, the school nurse is
at Student’s school from approximately 11:25 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., the time when
Student needs his insulin. Id.
The school nurse is at two other schools – the rest
of the school day on Wednesdays and Thursdays. N.T. 91.
27. The school nurse is responsible for three elementary schools: Student’s school,
which enrolls over 900 children; [redacted], which has over 400 students, and
[redacted] which has 211 children enrolled. N.T. 130;
www.schools.privateschoolsreport.com/Pennsylvania/Reading/redactedElementar
ySchool.html.
28. During the times the school nurse is not at Student’s school, there is no individual
at the school permitted to dispense insulin or Glucagon to Student. N.T. 90, 97.
29. When the school nurse is not present at Student’s school, the health assistant will
check Student’s blood levels. If he has a low blood sugar reading, she can give
Student juice. N.T. 98. If Student’s blood sugar level is very low or if he will not
eat or drink, the health assistant must call the school nurse and ask her to return to
school to give Student a Glucagon injection. N.T. 98.
30. If Student’s blood sugar level is high, the health assistant must call the school
nurse to return to the school to give Student insulin. N.T. 98.
31.
Page 5
5
32. It takes the school nurse between six and ten minutes to return to Student’s school
from the other schools. N.T. 91.
33. If the school nurse cannot return to the school to aide Student with his medication,
a school nurse from another District school comes to the building. N.T. 104.
This nurse is approximately ten minutes away from Student’s school. N.T. 118.
34. If an emergency occurred in school and the school nurse was not present, 911
would be called. N.T. 111. Response time for 911 services is approximately four
to five minutes. N.T. 151.
35. Student’s teacher has seen Student exhibit signs of low blood sugar and has sent
him to the nurse. N.T. 41. Unfortunately, she has sent him alone even though she
was asked not to by Student’s parents because of the possibility of Student
passing out on the trip to the nurse as a result of the low blood sugar. N.T. 41.
36. Prior to filing for a due process hearing, Student’s family would come to school to
test Student’s levels because the nurse was often not there. N.T. 71, 133.
Student’s parents also brought him his lunch or count the carbohydrates in the
school lunch Student was buying. N.T. 34, 35.
37. Since Student requested a due process hearing, a nurse has been available at
lunch most days to test Student’s sugar level. N.T. 34.
38. A few instances after Student filed for due process, the nurse did not return to the
school during lunch because she knew one of Student’s parents was there who
could check Student’s blood sugar level. N.T. 34-35.
39. Student’s doctor feels it is unsatisfactory to have the only person who can give
Student an injection off site and five minutes away because that is a long period
of time if Student has a seizure. N.T. 168.
40. Student’s doctor believes Student should have someone available at school at all
times who is trained in recognizing symptoms of low and high blood sugar and
who has the ability to administer a Glucagon and insulin injection. N.T. 166, 167-
168.
41. Student’s doctor believes it would be optimal for there to be someone in the
classroom who has the ability to give injections in an emergency. N.T. 169.
42. During the 2006-2007 school year, District’s nurse logged 47 low blood sugar
readings, 78 high blood sugar readings, and 52 normal blood sugar readings for
Student. S-1. Out of the 47 low blood sugar readings, 18 of those were close to or
lower than 40 – the number where Student’s doctor testified the Glucagon should
Page 6
6
be given immediately. S-1; N.T. 193-194. 2 At no time was the Glucagon given
to Student. S-1, N.T. 73.
43. Student’s doctor believes the reason Student has not had a blood sugar crisis in
school is because Student’s family is “on top of things.” N.T. 190.
44. Student’s blood sugar levels at school have been as high as 500 when the nurse
has not been in the school and over 400 when she has been in the school. N.T.
102.
45. Although the nurse’s office keeps a medical log that tracks Student’s blood sugar
levels, it does not list those times when the health assistant has had to call the
nurse for assistance or when Student was hospitalized as a result of low blood
sugar. N.T. 143, 144.
46. Normally, the school nurse does not retest Student after a high blood sugar
reading. N.T. 105-106, 132.
47. Student has not had seizure activities while in school. N.T. 69.
ISSUES
Is Student in need of someone at school full time who can dispense insulin and Glucagon
to Student when necessary?
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Following Schaffer v. Weast, 126 S. Ct. 528, 537, 163 L. Ed. 2d 387 (Nov. 14,
2005), and L.E. v. Ramsey Bd. of Educ., 435 F.3d 384 (3d Cir. 2006), the burden of
persuasion, as one element of the burden of proof, is now borne by the party bringing the
challenge. As it was Student who filed this due process request, he has the burden of
persuasion. Pursuant to Schaffer, though, it only comes into play when neither party
introduces preponderant evidence and, as a result, that evidence is fairly evenly
balanced. Although Schaffer related to a situation under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act and this hearing was brought only under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act, I will follow Schaffer as many Courts have used decisions under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act for cases arising under Section 504.
2 Student’s doctor testified, “if you’ve got a low blood sugar of 40, okay, and it takes about five seconds to
measure, the Glucagon should be given immediately. If the child is comatose, seizing or if the child is
absolutely refusing to take anything and the blood sugar is 40, it has to be given immediately.” N.T. 193-
194.
Page 7
7
In his closing, Student requested relief as stated below:
1.“Compensatory Education” in the form of compensation for [Student’s]
mother who has had to regularly come to the school to monitor her son’s
condition;
2. Implementation of a §504 Service Plan which includes that [Student]
has prompt access to a school nurse or other acceptable medical
professional who can determine if he needs an insulin injection, and
administer said injection, if his blood sugar is too high, or some form of
carbohydrate, if his blood sugar is too low;
3. Said placement to be in an appropriate least restrictive environment
such as his local neighborhood school or nearby private placement;
4. Counsel fees and costs; and
5. Such other relief as may be awarded and be appropriate.
However, in his opening, Student only requested that I order the District to have someone
full time at Student’s school who is permitted to dispense medication. Therefore, that is
the only issue that I will address and review. 3 In re the Educational Assignment of A.P.,
a Student in the Oxford Area School District, Special Education Opinion Number 1744
(2006).
The Pennsylvania School Code states that every child of school age should be
provided with school nurse services. 24 Pa Code § 14-1402(a.1). The Code also limits
the number of children under the care of each school nurse to no more than 1500. Id.
However, the school nurse responsible for Student’s care is responsible for over 900
children at [redacted] Elementary School, over 400 students at [redacted] Elementary
School, and 211 students at [redacted] Elementary School – a total of more than 1500
children. N.T. 130,
www.schools.privateschoolsreport.com/Pennsylvania/Reading/redactedElementarySchoo
l.html. This alone violates the Pennsylvania School Code and requires the District to hire
another school nurse.
Moreover, however, the District needs to provide a medical professional full time
at [student’s school] as an accommodation to Student as a result of his unstable blood
sugar levels during the school year. 4 During the 2006-2007 school year, District’s
nurse logged 47 low blood sugar readings, 78 high blood sugar readings, and only 52
normal blood sugar readings. S-1. Out of the 47 low blood sugar readings, 18 of those
were close to or lower than 40 – the number where Student’s doctor testified the
3Regarding the other issues first raised in his closing, Student provided no information during the hearing
for me to determine compensatory education nor any information to show that there is an issue of least
restrictive environment. Moreover, in Pennsylvania, I have no authority to order attorneys fees. Therefore,
even if Student raised these issues before me during the hearing, there is no evidence for me to find in his
favor regarding these issues.
4 Testimony offered stated the nurse is the only one employed by the District who can dispense insulin or
Glucagon to Student. N.T. 87-88, 90.
Page 8
8
Glucagon should be given immediately. S-1; N.T. 193-194. At no time was Glucagon
given to Student. S-1. Student, and the District, has been very lucky that no serious
diabetic episode has occurred during the school day. Based on his blood sugar readings,
it is clear that the possibility of a serious diabetic incident could have occurred at least 18
times during the school year where a Glucagon injection may have been necessary. S-1;
N.T. 193-194. In addition, since Student needs a daily injection of insulin, it is
imperative that a school nurse is available. Without a school nurse stationed at [student’s
school] on a daily basis, there is no guarantee a medical professional will be there to
dispense insulin to Student when he needs it.
Although these issues were not before me, I strongly recommend the District add
to Student’s § 504 Service Agreement that school personnel will monitor Student’s food
intake to ensure Student is eating when required. I also recommend the District recheck
Student’s high blood sugar levels as recommended by Student’s doctor, and that
Student’s teachers have someone walk Student to the school nurse when the teacher is
concerned Student may be exhibiting symptoms of low blood sugar.
Page 9
9
ORDER
The District must have on staff at Student’s school a full time staff member who
is trained in recognizing symptoms of low and high blood sugar and who has the ability
and training to administer a Glucagon and insulin injection.
_________________________________
M a r c i e R o m b e r g e r , E s q u i r e
